A study of male Emiratis risks of suffering from diabetes Essay

A study of male Emiratis risks of suffering from diabetes - Essay Example r research carried out among Gulf Cooperation Council nations, it has been identified that the leading and most prevalent diseases are Type 2 diabetes and obesity, which have made the region to be the leading in the world (Glass 2008). Indeed, WHO records shows that Saudi Arabia leads GCC nations as having the highest rate of obesity at 35.6 per cent while UAE comes fourth with 33.7 per cent of its population been identified to be overweight (Glass 2008). With regard to diabetes, UAE leads other GCC nations with 19.5 per cent of the population in the country estimated to have the disease while Saudi Arabia is the second (Glass 2008). Overall obesity is identified as the biggest contributory factor to prevalence of diabetes. Currently, UAE assumes the second position in the entire world to record the highest number of diabetes cases after the Pacific island of Narau, which is the world’s number one to record high cases of diabetes (El-Sharkawy, n.d). Studies on the prevalence of diabetes among the UAE citizens remain scanty, but from the few done in the past, the problem and associated statistics concerning diabetes have been studied. For example, Dun and colleagues conducted a research on the disease between 1997 and 1999 on a sample of UAE citizens, and their findings indicated that on overall, diabetes prevalence in the country was estimated to be about 20 per cent, with urban areas prevalence being 25.4 per cent and rural areas recording prevalence rate of 14.1 per cent (El-Sharkawy, n.d). iii) Lastly, the study will be essential in that it will produce recommendations and other observations about diabetes, which in turn will become necessary information in spreading health awareness about the disease. Current and satisfied statistics by the Imperial College London Diabetes Center indicate that among the UAE population, about 19.5 per cent are victims of diabetes (Shammaa, 2008). Further, figures released by the Research Center shows that prevalence rate

The Negligence In Term Of Law Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

The Negligence In Term Of Law - Essay Example The above definition has been taken from the case of Ryland. According to the Civil Act 2002 Section 42, the first part of negligence is the duty of care:â€Å"the standard of care required of the defendant is that of a reasonable person in the defendant’s position who was in possession of all the information that the defendant either had or ought reasonably to have had, at the time of the incident out of which the harm arose†   After ascertaining that there was a duty of care, the plaintiff has to prove that there was a breach of such duty, which resulted in an injury to the Plaintiff. In order to establish negligence as a Cause of Action under the law of torts, a plaintiff must prove that the defendant had a duty to the plaintiff, the defendant breached that duty by failing to conform to the required standard of conduct, the defendant's negligent conduct was the cause of the harm to the plaintiff, and the plaintiff was, in fact, harmed or damaged.The defense of Marv in would be the appropriate precaution of risk, and before concluding that argument let us define and precaution of risk as covered in the Act:â€Å"A person is not negligent in failing to take precautions against a risk of harm unless— (a) The risk was foreseeable (that is, it is a risk of which the person knew or ought to have known); and (b) the risk was not insignificant; and (c) in the circumstances, a reasonable person in the person’s position would have taken those precautions.†... The defence of Marvin would be appropriate precaution of risk, and before concluding that argument let us define and precaution of risk as covered in the Act: â€Å"A person is not negligent in failing to take precautions against a risk of harm unless— (a) the risk was foreseeable (that is, it is a risk of which the person knew or ought to have known); and (b) the risk was not insignificant; and (c) in the circumstances, a reasonable person in the person’s position would have taken those precautions.†4 Marvin has the defence of saying that he took enough precaution against the risk, but the pothole was in such a place that any other person in a similar situation would not have been able to avoid the accident. Along with this fact, the bike did not get damaged and Norton faced injury due to the fact that he had already been injured at the spot where he fell, which resulted in the aggravation of such injury. The right of Marvin is to sue the University of Canberra under the common law principle for not taking enough precaution in order to avoid the pothole where the bike crashed. He can transfer the liability onto the college by arguing on the basis of negligence on the part of college through not maintaining the University campus in the right order. The liability of Marvin is the fact that his actions caused injury to Norton, and on top of that he was drunk while he was riding. He did not take enough care and precaution when he knew while being drunk he should not have ridden the bike. Moving onto Norton, let us first deal with his liability. Norton was the one who introduced Marvin for drinking to drown his sorrows. From this point it can be inferred that he was totally aware of what was